Morocco, Spain´s friendly foe and what does Zapatero owe Mohamed.

It is really amazing to hear each and every important Spanish politician that good relations with Morocco are a must. It is even more shocking to hear Socialist politicians saying that we, Spain, have always great relations with the Kingdom of Morocco.

Good relations with Morocco is something desirable but it is far from being a must, and when someoene dares to say that we have such lovely relations with Moroccan autorities is maybe forgetting that we have had a war incident 7 years ago when kicking Moroccan soldiers off a small Spanish sovereignty island (Perejil), and forgetting as well that we have had no Moroccan ambassador for the last 8 months!

Most of Morocco´s strategic objectives include the need to weaken Spain. A strong Spain controlling from both sides the strait of Gibraltar (mainland Spain and Ceuta /Melilla) and developing a proactive foreign policy in Northern Africa is King-Dictator´s Mohamed VI worst nightmare.

Moroccan services know that a socialist led cabinet is always weaker. Socialist are more reluctant to show teeth, they also carry this unique Spanish guilt complex that consist in a "please forgive us" attitude towards any one who calls us racists or simply anyone saying they are "moderate" muslims.

Morocco knows that over a million of their citizens living in Spain and some even serving in our armed forces are a very important asset in their strategic game, but it is not the most important asset.

Every intelligence service knows that updated, relevant and dirty information about your rival is precious. In the intelligence arena Morocco has probably as much relevant information as Spain does but Morocco has a huge advantage: Morocco is not a democracy.

There is nothing such as free press, free television or freedom of opinion, the King and his people can do and undo at their own discretion and they can shut a radio station, censor newspapers and arrest journalist and no one will dare to protest. The Moroccan authorities have almost nothing to fear about their public opinion having access to confidential information leaked from Spanish secret services.

On the contrary Spanish authorities, from King Juan Carlos down to the last government official, have much more to fear about the use that Moroccan secret services do of the delicate information they manage.

The fact that it is very likely, in my case I am certain, that Morocco manages really compromising and delicate information about Madrid terrorsit attack in March 11th 2004 is a terrible threat to Spanish socialist government.

The possibility that Morocco´s services leak evidences that could lead to prove that some pro-socialist individuals operating in the "sewing system" of the Ministry of the Interior during the José María Aznar´s administration knew more about the terrorist attack is a devastating scenario for Spanish socialist government now.

If Morocco leaks information proving that pro-socialist elements were acting on their own during the conservative administration of Aznar and that these elements plotted so as to change the colour of the government in 2004, Zapatero would have to resign.

The sole idea of a joint venture between low profile Moroccan drug dealer criminals, that "happened" to be also police informers, and "freelance" pro socialist elements from the Spanish security services to change a government by the use of terror seems a crazy thing if we are not in the context of what happened in Spain in March 2004:

1.- Hundreds of tons of debris and unclaimed personal belongings from passengers on board the trains (evidences) vanished. This is something completely out of the police procedures about crime scene investigation and evidence protection. Even in plain or train accidents the wreckages are kept for months to be studied.

2.- The little evidence that was left was not analyzed by the Forensic Police Lab as it is regularly done. In this case they were analyzed by the deactivation squad lab, which is a lab meant for on site first analysis not for proper in depth studies.

3.- This terrorist attack that took place 3 days prior to the general elections was "solved" in less than two days, exactly the time needed for the socialist party to siege the Popular Party offices accross the country.

4.- A new analysis carried by 6 experts (from Police, Guardia Civil and 2 independent) proved that the explosive that blasted in March 11th 2004 was not Goma2-ECO nor Goma 2-EC as it was "proved" shortly after the attack.

There are many more odd and unexplained things surrounding this black chapter in recent Spanish History, I simply wanted to bring some of these obscure facts so as to put you in context.

No doubt this is a very delicate issue, and since it remains dark and, to all common sense standards, unsolved any secret service that manages relevant information about it can twist Zapatero´s wrist and put him on his knees, and chances are that Moroccan services have relevant and very "dirty" intelligence concerning this "terrorist" attack.

The socialist government has very little time left being in office, therefore Morocco must act fast to add more concessions from Spain before softy Zapatero disappears from the politic scenario.

The demonstrations in Melilla´s border to complain against the frontier police, with the Moroccan police letting then act, is just another excuse to put pressure on Zapatero.

Of course Morocco´s services know that the information they have about March 11th 2004 can be dangerous for Moroccan interests too but they also know well that what for them would be dangerous for the Spanish government would be simply devastating and that is how the game goes: Morocco pushing as they bear their March 11th "gun" and Spain slowly retreating trying to calm them.

For Moroccan services this is the kind of information that can "burn" your hands and "kill" your adversary. You don´t want to get burnt but you can run that risk whereas your adversary can´t afford to "be killed".

And what does Morocco expect from Spain for being such a friendly foe? They want several things, money included, but on top of the list we find:

1.- A pro Moroccan position with regard to Western Sahara. Spain was the colonisal metropoly in 1975 when the "Green March" from Morocco occupied Western Sahara. Franco was in his dying bed and king Juan Carlos (still prince in those days) flew there fast to tell everyone we had to pack our stuff and leave the Saharaui people to the hands of blody Hassan II. For 35 years Morocco has occupied an invaded territory that claims to be part of itself and for those same years Saharaui people have fought them with the support of Algeria who in 1975 wanted an Atlantic gate and is Morocco´s number one adversary in Northern Africa. If Spain shifts from a moderate neutral position (a coward position to my understanding) to a more pro-Moroccan one that would mean a big moral victory for them and a big punch on Spanish speaking Western Sahara freedom fighters.

2.- A less intense relation with Algeria. Self-explanatory.

3.- More concessions in terms of European Union-Morocco relations. That translates into less restrictions for Morocco to export fruit and vegetables which of course, although many Spanish companies own these Moroccan export businesses, has an impact on Spanish products distribution accross the rest of Europe. Also means to grant Morocco with best in class agreements with the EU in all the fields of commerce and investment.

4.- To occupy the two Spanish cities in Northern Africa: Ceuta and Melilla. This is a long term objective that from a Moroccan perspective cannot be achived until they count with enough military strength and the approval of the USA or whatever regional or global power that may exist by the time they believe this goal must be achived. The Perejil island incident proved that the USA backed Spain while France was more pro-Moroccan and also proved that Aznar was up to no jokes when the commandos jumped from the helicopters. Another recurrent threat that Morocco uses is that a more radical Islamic regime would be a threat to these two Spanish cities and for that reason Spain must support Mohamed´s tyranny.

During the last 40 years our policy towards Morocco can be described using the sentence that Frank Delano Roosvelt once said referring to Somoza:

"He may be a son of a bitch but he is our son of a bitch"

In the game theory applied to foreign strategic relations when you play hawk against someone who plays dove usually you will get good results while the other part chooses to go on playing in dove "mode". This is the case here; Zapatero thinks that we owe Morocco something and he is playing the appeasement role, same as he does with any dictator of this planet, thinking he does that for the sake of some stupid concept named "Civilization Allience".

What is civilization dude? To put down women and mistreat them is civilization Zapatero? To prosecute gays? To chop the hands off thieves? To forbit the preaching of another religion?

What can Spain do to revert this situation? Easy; change into hawk "mode":

1.- Support Bereber factions in Northern Morocco. Create a network of radio and television broadcasting stations in Berber (something that is forbidden in Morocco) and weaken the King´s position in this part of the Moroccan Empire (it was not part of Morocco until the Sultan became king and the Rif gained independence from Spain and the souther part of the country gained control over the Berber lands of the Kabilas)

2.- Support Western Sahara independence in the UN and all the international forums. Grant Saharaui people Spanish support and humanitarian aid and financial funds. Broadcast for the Western Sahara from Canary Islands for the sake of free information and the right of the Saharaui people to have their own mass media.

3.- Sell technology and weapons to Algeria, train their police officers and military personnel. Foster Algeria´s role in the UE-Northern Africa relations. Support Algerian territorial claims (there is a land of about 200.000 square kilometers claimed by Morocco and Algeria)

4.- Help true democratic parties and movements in Morocco allowing them to have voice and presence. Foster a real change in the Moroccan regime, proving that the Tyranny can be replaced for something different than the Islamic fundamentalism.

This last point is the most important one. Helping democracy flourish in Morocco and helping Moroccan people to prosper (without the fear of an almighty feudal regime that controls everything deciding who can get rich and sucking the wealth off the poor Moroccan citizens) would be terrific.

Only the border between North and South Korea exemplifies a bigger gap than the gap between Spain and Morocco in terms of income per capita. This wealth gap must be closed as much as possible and that can´t be done with the current rotten regime. I believe that fostering a large and influent middle class in Morocco and creating the appropriate environment of confidence and freedom is the best that can be done for the sake of Moroccans and Spaniards.

Tweet

Dictator-King of Morocco Mohamed thinks we are racists too

Mohamed, the son of Hassan, has had a phone call from our king Juan Carlos, aka "my family goes first".

The reason for this call is that these last days continuous and "spontaneous" demonstrations against Spanish Police are taking place in the border between our two countries near the Spanish city of Melilla.

These demonstrators are boycotting the normal traffic of merchandises between Morocco and Spain and have caused shortage in Melilla´s markets.

The cause of these demonstrations according to rioters is that the Spanish Police is treating Moroccan subjects with disrespect and showing racist prejudices.

The Spanish Foreign Affair minister, Mr. Moratinos, has not yet made any comment on these serious events, as a matter of fact he seems not to be "available".

King Juan Carlos has had to call Mohamed the sixth to ask for some clarification and the government spokeswoman María Teresa Fernández de la Vega has said that this is not going to affect our good relations with our southern neighbours.

I find so odd and so stupid the fact that all our government cabinets have always issued these same statements when it comes to any matter concerning Morocco. For any not well informed observer that would read this official statements it would seem as if our relations with Morocco were at the level of those the USA has with neighbour Canada.

But the truth is that Morocco is not a democracy by any means, that no one decides in such Theocracy to demonstrate in front of the border insulting the Spanish Police and denigrating the female officers with irrespectful pictures if they do not count with the royal support.

The prove to what I am saying is that these demonstrations take place right before Moroccan Police and that these policemen do not do anything to prevent these people from insulting and denigrating.

Who are the racists in this play? Because this is a play that is being directed by the Moroccan King. Are the Spanish police officers in the border racist? I cannot answer that question. I can just say that I am sure some are and some are not, and that each and everyone of them will have his or her opinion about Morocco, and that maybe the constant traffic of hash and the lack of respect that many Moroccan males show to policewomen can create a bad image in some Spaniards, including police officers.

.

I can also say that slapping a female agent is probably a demonstration of hatred and lack of principles and maybe someone could call that an act of racism.

The racist argument is just an excuse for the Moroccan secret service and feudal king Mohamed to put pressure on our weak government. A government run by the mesiah of something he calls the "Civilization Allience", a man who has brought misery and poverty to Spaniards.

.

A man that while fighting hard to allow 16 year old girls to abort without parental consent or to grant the right to adopt to homosexual couples did not really care to fight our raging unemployment. Our President, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, a man everyone consideresd a clown among high net worth politicians after his speech during the Bilderberg Meeting in Sitges (Barcelona). He will be fighting to change our consciences and he will be, and he is and acts as, the biggest of cowards when he must face a dictator such as Mohamed or Hugo Cavez and tell them not to mess with us like former President José María Aznar did.

Mohamed knows that Spain is weaker than ever in the international arena and he plans to apply pressure to Zapatero so as to steal from us our two cities in Northern Africa: Ceuta y Melilla.

Mohamed knows a lot of things about what really happened before, during and after the March 11th 2004 terrorist attacks in Madrid.

Many of the arrested ones were Moroccans and in Morocco nothing escapes the control of the secret police. Maybe pieces of information could be leaked from Morocco.

.

Maybe that information could lead to prove that a plot orchestrated by pro-socialist elements withing the Spanish secret services and police together with some Moroccan scapegoats provided with the help of Moroccan services, that were nothing but small drug dealers and none of them belonged to Al Qaeda or even attended their Mosque on friday, were responsible of the terrorist attack.

.

That information could result devastating for Zapatero, who knows that the official theory about the march 11th attack has less solid grounds than the Moroccan plot, and he is going to go down on his knees before Mohamed or anyone that can threaten him in such way. Maybe that is the reason why king Juan Carlos has had to act as a royal foreign affairs minister.

.

Former President José María Aznar used the green beret elite forces to expel Moroccan troops from an small island of Spanish sovereignty (Isla Perejil), that was Mohamed first try and he found out that the guy with the moustache was up to no jokes...Maybe that caused 11th of March terrorist attacks in Madrid that was the direct cause of Zapatero victory three days after.

.

Mohamed and Zapatero both know that bearing such "weapon" could cause a lot of harm to both parties and Mohamed and Zapatero know that Ceuta and Melilla becoming Moroccans would cause a revolt in Spain and very likely a war against Morocco and Zapatero would have to look for shelter in Rabat.

Tweet

The US State Department removes contentious advice about Spain racist prejudices. Wow, thank you!!

The Obama administration removed this racism warning about Spain from the Department of State web page only a few hours before Michelle Obama landed in our country.

According to the State Department until August 2nd 2010 Afro-Americans visiting Spain were more likely to be arrested due to Spanish Police racist prejudices.

Thank you Hillary for considering us all of the sudden less racist than a week ago!! Thank you Barack and Michelle for giving us the chance to demonstrate that we are no bigots any more!!

We want to become a country as politically correct as the USA where black people (I call black black and white white otherwise I would have to be considered a European American if I was living in the US and if I was black I would be an Euro-African-American and that does not make sense to me) living in Chicago, Los Angeles, Detroit or New York have the same chances of being arrested than white people. We want to become a country where black people have the same opportunities to catch a taxi as white folks same as they do in the streets of New York at 1 am at night...

Since Michelle Obama´s visit to Spain we have gotten ridden of our sick racist mindset, now we are a bit more liberals and open minded and we shall go riding our donkeys in our bullfighter outfit down the streets of Madrid or Barcelona with our heads up high. Now we can all sleep our 3 hour daily siesta without having racist nightmares due to eating to much paella and drinking too much sangria.

We have carried this problem for centuries and I am not talking about racism, Brits and Americans are about 10 times more racist than we are, I am talking about bad-press and our black legends.

During the Spanish-American war, the yellow press led by Randolph Hearst and Joseph Pulitzer, published all kinds of supposed atrocities.

Frederick Remington while in Cuba told Hearst:

"Everything is quiet. There is no trouble. There will be no war. I wish to return."

Supposedly, although he (Hearst) denied it afterwards, he quickly wired back:

"Please remain. You furnish the pictures and I'll furnish the war."

Americans wanted Cuba at any cost and in my opinion they blew one of their ships (The USS Maine) in a Spanish harbour and entered that war for which the southern states and some fruit companies longed for so many years.

Barack Obama himself said in his famous speech to Egyptian students at Cairo University:

"Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance. We see it in the history of Andalusia and Cordoba during the Inquisition". HAHAHAHAHAAHA

If I said something like:

Spain has a proud history of baseball players. We see it in the history of London during the Soccer Championship

It would make much more sense than Obama´s sentence. Obama claims himself as a historian sometimes, then how can hen read this total fiction sentence without blushing?

During the Inquisition (it would be more appropriate to say in the time of...) Cordova was no longer under Islam´s fist. It had been reconquest by Ferdinand the Third in 1236 and all the lives of the inhabitants respected.

The Inquisition was enforced in Spain in 1478.

So that supposedly tolerant muslim Cordova never coexisted with the Spanish Inquisition!!

Obama could have said that the best NBA seasons and matches took place during the Florence Renaissance and it would be as close to be true as his totally absurd sentence about Islam.

And going back to the Inquisition. It appears that Inquisition must always go together with the adjective "Spanish" like if it was something unique to Spain.

Well the Inquisition was first established by Pope Lucio III in 1184 almost 300 years before it was implemented in Spain (after 800 years of war against Islam). Inquisition was founded for all the Christian world and it was implemented in almost every country before it began in Spain.

In fact English jews were expelled to Spain before we did that same thing centuries later. Both things are evil yes, and also both things must be put into a context too but please do not give Spain the monopoly for the Inquisition!!

We have carried that black legend for years and still carry it and maybe no one in the Anglosaxon world has taken a close look at how many descendents of native Americans are there in the USA or Canada and how many are there in Mexico, Bolivia, Ecuador, etc.

Anyway, thak you Hillary for granting us a better status in your web page!!

Soon I shall write something very unknown about a Spanish and an American Hero named Bernardo Gálvez (Galveston is named after him) and how he busted half a dozen British Forts with a bunch of the finest Spanish warriors in a time of revolt in a place some British folks still call "The Colonies" with some stiff upper lip attitude.

Tweet

A world without "real" money? No thanks

Some supermarkets in Holland don´t accept cash payments and by 2014 most of them will not take bank notes, only plastic money:

http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2009/06/supermarkets_set_to_refuse_cas.php

This decision is based on preventing armed robberies. There were 200 armed robberies in 2008 in Holland and there are thousands of supermsarkets, and yes most of us are against people assaulting businesses so maybe we should support this decission. Or should we not?

Regardless of the fact that credit cards do not always do its work due to magnetic failures, chips being screwed, or bank problems of all kinds (connections, lack of funds and so on)if a retailer in Holland does not accept a bank note issued in euros, Holland´s official currency, paper money becomes a second class type of money and those who have not access to plastic money will not have access to that retailer´s good or services.

Another important subject to be taken into consideration, if not the most important, is the answer to the question: Must everyone have a credit or a debit card? If the answer is yes then the next question is short and disturbing: Why?

Why must everyone be compelled to have plastic money? If the answer is what Dutch supermarket retailers have argued, preventing robberies, my reaction is a sarcastic laughing.

Forcing people to pay with plastic money for the sake of security is like forcing a woman to wear a burka to prevent her from being raped or, like we say in Spain, to kill flies with canon shells.

If you want to prevent robberies, do it investing in security, complaining at police office or any other way you can think of instead of cutting my freedom to use my money, which is legal tender, the way I want.

The three main reasons behind the whole idea of getting rid of paper money are to control, then to control and finally to control, period.

It is not enough that anyone can be tracked and located using the mobile phone signal, even whe it is shut, and that governments, like ours in Spain, are issuing identity documents including a microchip, now they want us to tell them all what do we buy, when do we buy it, where do we buy it and how often do we buy it.

that way they can know what medicines we purchase, how often do we refuel, where do we go and how long do we stay in a place.

In Spain our Government praises the advantages of the new chip incorporated identity card. You can access your social security payments, they say, you can pay your taxes using internet, you can ask for your labour record and so on.

That is all true; so handy, so trendy, and so convenient, but it is also handy for the government that you use this chip card and it is also really interesting to trace you using satellites anywhere in the world.

If you are among those who give up their privacy and freedom for the sake of handiness I guess you will not have any problem the day your funds have been confiscated for whatever reason or you have been imprisoned for driving too fast and they got that information out of ur mobile phone signal.

I personally want my children to buy candy without that buying information being given to someone other than the shop tender, I want to buy the newspaper I choose without leaving a trace and I want to have a coffee without the fear of having my insurance company being updated on my vicious habits and given them some tips about why must they raise my insurance policy.

Let us keep our cash and let us keep our privacy or at least let us do so while YOU, dear BigBro, track our DNA in our brand new bank notes.

Some of us do not want to go on our knees, if not to pray to our loved only God. Amen.

Tweet

Spaniards find abortion more acceptable than noisy people at night

According to a recent survey conducted by Caja Madrid´s (a Spanish Savings Bank) Foundation Spaniards find social behaviours such abortion or euthanasia far more acceptable than to make noise at night in the streets or driving too fast.
Below some social behaviours listed from the most well tolerated to the least acceptable for Spaniards with the percentage of acceptance / tolerance:

1.- To apply euthanasia to anyone who asks for it 60,2%
2.- Entire freedom to abort 54,2%
3.-To have sexual relations with a person of the same sex 44,4%
4.-Death penalty to persons with very serious crimes 35,8%
5.-To smoke in public buildings 23,5%
6.-To commit suicide 21,0%
7.-To benefit from a professional promotion playing with advantage 17,5%
8.-To make pitfall in examinations 16,9%
9.-To get drunk in public places 15,1%
10.-A love adventure outside marriage 14,2%
11.-To smoke marijuana or hashish in public places 13,6%
12.-Genetic Modification of the food 12,7%
13.-Cheat in taxes 11,8%
14.-To buy something that is likely to have been stolen 11,5%
15.-To do noise on weekend nights 10,7%
16.-Stealing goods in large Department Stores 7,3%
17.-To look for excuses to skip work 6,9%
18.-To lie in self-interest although it may harm others 6,8%
19.-Driving too fast 6,2%
20.-Hiring an immigrant with worse working conditions for the
fact of being an immigrant 4,5%
21.-Drunk driving 4,0%
Building excuses to skip work or to steal a perfume in a department store is a much worse behaviour than to abort under any circumstances for most Spaniards. I am a Spaniard too and I cannot say I am not a bit in shock after going through this survey. I feel disgusted and ashamed of belonging to a society more concerned with their sleep or with their colleagues excuses to not go to work than with who and why must decide about an old man´s fate.

What lies behind this survey is a rotten and sick society of individuals that as long as they are not bothered or directly threatened they do not give a shit. We are a flock of sheep that does not care about an unborn baby because the killing of that someone we don´t see does not affect us, but if that baby would be there smoking then we would find that a shame!

In my opinion the attitude of the Spanish society pictured in this survey represents the success of those who have submitted us for the last 4 decades to a constant social engineering process and shows how powerful certain groups can become with the help of a continuous media bombardment.

This is worse than moral relativism. Moral relativism basically implies that nothing is "completely" good or bad and that it all depends on the context and so on... This survey shows that us Spaniards think that bad, wrong, evil and unacceptable things are those that can directly affect us in our lives: smoke, noise, cheating colleagues, drunk drivers and "illegal shoppers" (probably because we all know those robberies are included in what we pay).

In my opinion this survey proves that it is not (only) that we think that nothing is totally good or bad but that we tolerate and admit much more some really awful, bad and evil things like abortion or euthanasia because it is something that does not directly affect us.
Going more into detail this survey also shows that the younger the people the more upside down their values are.
Finally I find some comfort in that we find regrettable that immigrants are unfairly treated when hired, that is the only good news I can see in this dreary survey. I am also optimistic given the fact that the action-reaction principle has been a constant in human History and this status quo will revert into a healthier society despite some big brother wannabes.
Can you read me Zapatero?

I would appreciate all readers comments!! Be my guests! You can post news too! Contact me admin@yourglobalevent.com

Tweet

About "cojones", Obama, Zapatero and King Juan Carlos

We talked some days ago about the fact that Fighting Bulls are allowed to keep their malehood attributes whereas beef bulls are castrated around the age of 6...months.

According to Sarah Palin Barak Obama must be a beef bull as we can see in the above video when she accuses President Obama of not having "cojones" which is the slang and macho word for testicles.

With respect to inmigration our President José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero lacks "cojones" as well, same as when it comes to defend our national interests abroad or when he should address some hard words to our neighbour dictator King Mohamed of Morocco...King Juan Carlos, who has and shares several economic interests with muslim countries dictators has the cojones required to look after his royal wealthy family and those same cojones vanish into the air when it comes to do his job and explicitly defend the unity of our country. Juan Carlos has retractable cojones, something really handy to keep his throne a bit more but a shame for all Spaniards.

Tweet

Michelle Obama´s visit to Spain. Good news for Spain´s economy.

Michelle Obama and her daughter Sasha will spend some of their holidays in Costa del Sol´s world famous Marbella.

According to "Oak Power Comunicación", the company that has conducted the analysis, Obama´s wife and daughter visit to Spain will be covered by 660 televisions, 2500 newspapers, 2100 internet media, 900 radios, and 1950 magazines.

This massive coverage constitutes a great showcase for Marbella, Andalusia and the whole Spain in the international media and it is a great opportunity for Spain to be considered among the safest, most chic and exclusive touristic destinations. Oak Power Comunicación calculates in 800 million the cost of a marketing campaign with similar results as those the visit of America´s first lady will bring.

In fact Spain is a terrific holiday destination that combines affordable prices, quality services, good infrastructures, and an amazing cultural offer combined with probably the best cusine in the world. But Obama´s family choice adds something really important for US toursits: acknowledging Spain is safe place to travel to. This is probably one of the most, if not the most, important things US tourist take into consideration when deciding where to travel and for Americans if the first lady chooses Spain that means not only that she likes the destination but that the President considers Spain a safe place.

So welcome Mrs. Obama! Enjoy paella and our great fish, relax in our beaches, be amazed by our monuments and do not forget to tell your friends and neighbours about what nice people we are. So nice that maybe we do not deserve the curse of having Mr. Zapatero as our President!!

Tweet