Tales of a Traitor blackmailed by a Tyrant. Is President Zapatero paying King Mohamed´s silence over a coup d´etat disguised as a terrorist attack?

Sometimes the worst possible scenario is the only one that makes sense.

Did Moroccan secret services and thus omnipresent King Mohammed have something to do with the 11th of March 2004 terrorist attacks in Madrid?

If the answer is yes: Why were the Moroccan authorities interested in helping these attacks take place just 3 days before the Spanish General Elections?

If the answer to the above question is that the final outcome of those General Elections, Mr. Zapatero unexpected victory, was what Moroccan services were seeking then the third question would be if Zapatero or the Spanish Socialist Party at any level knew about the Moroccan plotting.

If the answer to the last question is yes then there is a final set of questions with very disturbing answers whatever these may be :

Did the Spanish Socialist Party cooperate at any level with this plot?

Did they know the proportions of this undercover coup d´etat, that is 192 killed persons?

What did Moroccan services and the king ask for in return for their "assistance"?

Let us go over what has been going on in the last 9 years.

Year 2001, Mr. José María Aznar, Popular Party, is leading the Spanish government. The Spanish foreign policy is aligned with the USA and Great Britain and there is a solid support to the war on terrorism. In Northern Africa Mr. Aznar is aligned with Algeria, Morocco´s first enemy in the area and Spain´s main natural gas supplier.

The Spanish pro-Algerian position infuriates King Mohammed of Morocco. Algeria has several disputes with Morocco including the Western Sahara. The Saharaui cause has historically been supported by Algeria, who was excluded of the Madrid Treaty, after Spain cowardly handed the control of the territory to satisfy Moroccan imperial will.

Spain is pushing forward the creation of a census in Western Sahara in order to comply with UN resolutions for the referendum of self-determination of the inhabitants of this occupied territory. Spain is also strengthening its military might in both sides of the Strait of Gibraltar, saying no to Moroccan exorbitant economic claims to allow Spainish ships to fish in what only Morocco considers its own waters (Western Sahara waters in fact). Also discussions have not progressed on a comprehensive maritime delimitation, setting limits on resource exploration and refugee interdiction, leading Spain to unilaterally designate a median line from the Canary Islands.

Morocco´s answers to this unspected strong position from Spain is to foster illegal inmigration and to withdraw its ambassador to Madrid. Never since the 1960´s had Spain showed this determination to Moroccan tyrants.

In December 2001 José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, leader of the Spanish Socialist Party since 2000, visited King Mohammed and accepted to be photographed sitting by the king with a big map of Morocco, that included Spanish territories, presiding the scene. Why did the tyrant invited Zapatero and why was Zapatero providing political support to this tyrant in a very tense moment, only 2 months after Morocco decided to withdraw its ambassador to Madrid? Why on Earth was Zapatero acting as if he was a loyal subject of Mohammed? Why was Zapatero in need of the tyrant´s support and at the time when this tyrant was acting undisguised as a true enemy of Spain?

What could have made the leader of a party that has historically supported the Saharaui people go kotowing the tyrant that has succeeded his bloody father in torturing and harassing those Saharaui men and women?

Imagine the Republican Party leader paying a visit to the leader of a country that has withdrawn its ambassador in Washington and that declares Obama a traitor!!

In July 2002 Moroccan troops occupied the Island of Perejil, a tiny Spanish uninhabited island in the Strait of Gibraltar claimed by Morocco. The purpose of this action was no other than to test the Spanish answer and to acquire an advantageous position to negotiate with the hated Aznar´s government. Some weeks later Spanish elite troops expelled the Moroccan military with no blood shed sending a very strong response to King Mohammed.

Spain was determined to go on supporting the Sahara Referendum, to strengthen its military control of its waters and to build up a friendly relationship with Algeria and it was Morocco´s problem to send a new ambassador to Madrid, and most important was not going to allow king Mohammed to goof around with sovereignity matters.

Then in March 11th 2004 several bombs killed 192 persons in Madrid and 3 days later Zapatero unexpected victory was a fact.

"Evidence" were "found" in 24 hours leading to determine it had been an Islamic act of terror. Such as a conveniently handy-dandy Q´aram cassete tape in a van, a hand bag with a type of explosive that is not the one used by ETA (funny that this bomb had no igniting device...)

The attack has never been claimed by Al Qaeda, the modus operandi was completely different to the attacks in New York and London, no suicide attack was committed. All the evidences from the train debris, unclaimed clothes and objects were destroyed or put to fire in less than a week.

All the suppoused authors of the attack died some weeks later in a flat surrounded by the police after an alleged shooting. The only ones who escaped either ran to Morocco and ended up vanishing or allegedly died in Irak or Afghanistan.

No intellectual mastermind of these attacks was ever determined to be behind the whole plot or was ever found.

Years later it has been scientifically proven that the explosive blasted in those trains was not the alleged Goma 2 ECO nor Goma 2 EC...the same found in the phony evidence conveniently "found" in the hand bag the police used to determined the type of explosive...Six Police, Guardia Civil and independent specialists came to that same conclusion: The explosive found in the scarce evidence that was not destroyed was NOT the explosive determined to have been during the trial.

All evidence lead to believe that the same sewer systems of the Police loyal to the Socialist Party during the dirty war against ETA had fooled the still in office Spanish government to make it first believe that it was ETA and then "solving" the case by finding the appropriate evidences in a record time.

Basically they had 48 hours to do that so everyone would go to vote thinking that the government had lied to the people and that the attacks were the consequence of the Spanish support to the USA in the Irak war.

Over 90% of the arrested and convicted criminals were police informers, and mostly Moroccans and they made their living by dealing with drugs

During those days someone named Alfredo Pérez Rubalcaba dared to say: "Spain deserves a government that will not lie".(This man is now Minister of the Interior and has an unbeatable track record of lies and humbugs. In 1995 he said that there would never be any evidence of the suppoused support given by the Socialist Government to illegal counter terrorists group GAL and months later the Minister of Interior was imprisoned for that support together with the Chief of Police.)

You can read more about the March 11th 2004 attacks in Madrid in this blog but going back to the consequences that this terrorist attack had for the Moroccan-Spanish ralations let us go over what has happened in recent years, months and days:

-Spain has quited supporting the Sahara´s Referendum. Now the Spanish position is that both parties must come to an agreement (regardless of what the agreement is like)

-Spain has abandoned its position regarding the territorial waters between Canary Islands and the coast of Morocco.

-The Artillery Command deployed in the Strait of Gibraltar has been dismantled and raplaced by a simple regiment

-Morocco is building its biggest naval base 20 kilometers away from the Spanish town of Ceuta.

-During the King´s supported "spontaneous" demonstrations in the border between Spain and Morocco in Melilla where Spanish police women were insulted and threatened and the demosntrators accused of racism to our police with no evidences the minister of Foreign Affairs did not end his holidays in France and there was no protest note from the Spanish Government.

-These days the Moroccan Army has stormed in a civilian saharaui camp, arresting, shooting and killing, looting and plundering and they have expelled all Spanish journalists covering this massacre. The Moroccan Foreign Affairs minister in a join press conference with his colleague Trinidad Jiménez has accused the Spanish media of being anti-Moroccan, biassed and even racists and our minister Mrs. Jiménez said that she respects but does not share her colleague opinion. No condemn about the murder of civilians, a Spanish citizen among these. President Zapatero has not yet said a word about this.

No matter what Morocco does, Spain´s official answer is that Morocco is one of our dearest friends and that we shall ask the Moroccan authorities about their opinion on what has happened, no official condemnation or a hint of criticism that could annoy King Mohammed.

Perhaps the criminal attacks on March 11th 2004 are not the reason for it, but the facts prove that after these attacks and since Zapatero has been running the Spanish Government (also since March 2004) the Moroccan authorities have achieved all they wanted with respect to Spain.

Unfortunately there is no other explanation more reasonable to understand Spain´s current position with respect to Morocco and the submissive behaviour of our President and all his cabinet when dealing with the non democratic government of Morocco than to acknowledge that Moroccan services know something that could destroy Zapatero´s political future and plunge the Spanish Socialist Party into the depths of hatred of all Spaniards...for centuries.

Sometimes the worst possible scenario is the only one that makes sense...and sometimes I wish I had no common sense or at least I DO wish I my common sense is fooling me. However traitors exist and so do tyrants and sometimes they meet in December.

Tweet

What can Zapatero expect after being the worst curse Spain has had to suffer in the last 35 years? A lifetime salary! Part 1

The man you see in the picture will soon be swept from office in the forecoming general elections 2012 unless we get lucky and he ends up admiting we need elections sooner and admiting he has been a curse to our country.

Dissenting voices are being heard these days in Zapatero´s Spanish Socialist Party (PSOE) calling for a "change" of policies and not hiding that the best change would be to lose sight of Zapatero for the next 4 or 50 years.

Critics are springing up like mushrooms in autumn after Zapatero´s chosen one to run as candidate to the Madrid regional elections (Trinidad Jiménez) was defeated in the primary elections held this last October 3rd and after the polls published in 3 important newspapers show a gap of almost 14 points between PP and PSOE.

PSOE´s regional leaders are not being critic after realizing that Zapatero is a damnation for our country, that they knew long ago and did not care when they did not feel their "thrones" at risk, they are being critic now that they are really scared of losing their priviledges and status.

In some regions like Andalucía PSOE has been the ruling party for the last 35 years and losing that position is a nightmare for the thousands of PSOE politicians and tens of thousands of friends and relatives of these that have been digitally (using the finger) appointed. Not to mention all the rubbish that a rotten regional administration and an accomplice judicial system have been hiding for decades

In terms of national economy Zapatero´s legacy is a total tragedy for all of us. A soaring foreign debt skirocketing in the last three years, some 5 million real unemployed workers (22% of the total workforce) coming from 2 million in 2004 (11%), 2 out of 3 new unemployed workers in the EU live in Spain, our unemployment rate doubles that of the Eurozone and it is 2.5 times OCDE´s average unemployment.

Zapatero has weaken the Spain´s unity by irresponsibly supporting divising laws and by granting nazionalist parties political and economical support. He has divided the civil society by passing laws allowing 16 year old girls to abort without parental consent.

It is really odd that while Zapatero allows underage girls to kill their babies on their own he does not allow them to go to the cinema to watch a movie (Blood Money) about the thriving abortion industry, its killing methods and the psycological consequences of abortion. This movie is rated +18...

Zapatero´s cabinet is crowded with either unskilled socialist demagogues heading useless ministries or professional liers such as our Vice President María Teresa Fernández de la Vega or ministry of interior Alfredo Pérez Rubalcaba. Zapatero has always removed from his side independent thinkers and intelligent people who rather serve Spain than our maniac President.

Soon part two. More figures and some interesting information about Zapatero´s boys and girls

Tweet

General Strike in Spain, the big masquerade.

The call from the two main Spanish sindicates for a General Strike on this last September 29th resulted in a big fiasco for these two state budget parasites organizations: UGT and CCOO.

With some 2 million affiliates out of some 19 million active workers they claim to represent the interests of Spanish workers.

.

This "general" strike was followed and supported by less than 10 per cent among civil servants in the administration and almost ignored by all the small and medium size companies and their employees specially those involved in the services activity. The only real impact was in the industrial sector where the so called "information pickets" could easily "convince" their colleagues of the need to second this strike.

.

In Madrid all shops were opened and they only shut when these pickets showed up to immediately re-open when the pickets moved away.

.

The bus transport in Madrid was sabotaged early in the morning in the garages but once the pickets were forced not to "inform" so intensively buses operated as usual as so did the subway all day long.

.

In Barcelona it was rather different. The anti-system elements that the Catalan regional government has pampered for so many years (the guy in charge of the police there is an anti-system communist-ecologist himself and so is the elder son of the President Montilla) roamed the streets of downtown Barcelona defying police and setting urban cashiers and waste bins in fire, ending in a police car on fire.

.

Power comsumption diminished only by some 11% compared to what it was expected if the strike would have not taken place (in other general strikes it was over 20% less) and people all accross the country showed their contempt for these trade unionists that so "kindly" asked them to follow their slogans.

Spain has some real 5 million unemployed persons, this accounts for 21% of the active population and is over twice the average of the European Union.

When Mr. Zapatero came to power back in 2004 we had roughly 10% of unemployment rate and an state budget surplus. during these last 6 years Mr Zapatero´s policies have put Spain to the brim of ruin and bankruptcy...With the approval of the two main sindicates!!!

.

When forced by the European Union, the USA and China (Chinese Prime Minister and President Obama called President Zapatero almost the same day in May to tell him that he either shifted his economic policy and changed or he would be in serious trouble) Mr. Zapatero announced, some 5 months ago, budget and salary (for the administration workers) cuts. This change of policy has finally triggered this strike when the two sindicates exploded with calculated rage.

.

A very well calculated rage we must say because the strike was against the entrepreneurs and the Popular Party more than against Mr. Zapatero who they know is not acting on his on will but remotely directed by Brussels and Washington.

.

It is really odd and striking (yes this word goes realy well in here!) that these trade unions which supported Zapatero on his way to the present ruinous situation and that said nothing when Zapatero denied the very existence of an upcoming crisis two years ago or when the unemployment rate grew rapidly due to that policy that they supported and are therefore co-responsible of the present situation, have called for a general strike against the budget cuts that Spain has had to implement.

.

It is as if someone who has been trying to put a fire out by pouring gasoline goes completely crazy when the chief fireman decides to give it a chance to using water...

.

This sindicates get hundreds of million in state and regional grants, have thousands of wht they call liberates (basically they get paid and do not work so as to suppousedly have time to look after their colleagues labor problems), earn fortunes by monopolize the training courses that unemployed people do and that are useless.

.

They have behaved like leeches always sucking from the state budget and always willing to plunder tax payers and they are still doing that. They have put on stage a soft strike so as not to offend too much Mr. Zapatero for they are very well awared of the fact that they cannot exist on their own strength funding their expenses only from their affiliates dues.

.

The main Trade Union leaders earn fortunes and have exquisite tastes when choosing their holidays or restaurants and the mere idea of having to work scares them to death.

.

This last sunday shortly after this masquerade strike (Oct. 3rd) newspaper "El País" has published a poll showing almost 15 points of difference between PP (Popular Party) and PSOE (Socialist Party): 43% versus 28%. El País is by the way a traditional ally to the PSOE.

.

Somehow people is fed up with all the lies Zapatero keeps repeating and this strike that was not intended to impact in the President´s image too much devastated his already weak position.

Stay tuned for Zapatero´s next moves, he is now desperate and he is very dangerous. Do not forget what happened shortly before he came to power in 2004...

Tweet

One more on reciprocity and Islam

La Meca disco was founded in 1989 in the city of Águilas in the south east province of Murcia (Spain) with the only intention of establishing an entertainment business with some arab glamour.

.

This month of June "La Meca" was re-opened and this has exacerbated the wrath of several muslim groups accross the Islamic world.

If we were to believe that always repeated mantra most Western politicians want to tattoo in our brains that proclaims that only fundamentalistic muslims are evil, we would expect that only those fundamentalists have had a negative reaction regarding the fact that a disco has the name of an Arab city.

Well, contrary to what we could expect if we were to believe the bunch of naive and silly politicians that rule our Western countries the reaction accross the Umma (Islam countries and peoples) has been negative and threatening.

The same "spontaneous" group that led the demonstrations which took place at the Moroccan-Spanish border by the city of Melilla ("The Platform of Northern Morocco Civil Society") accusing the Spanish police to be racist without any evidence has urged the Moroccan Ulema Council to rule on the relations that the Spanish Popular Party (PP) has with muslim organizations in the Spanish cities of Ceuta and Melilla and they have added:

"...Especially when the party that promoted and gave approval to the name of Mecca to a nightclub in the coastal town of Murcia which governs this extremist party"

This Moroccan civil society organization that insulted and denigrated Spanish policewomen without presenting any evidence and that did not mention that some of those policewomen they yielded at had been spitted on, threatened and even slapped in their faces by Moroccan men entering Spain only for the fact of being women and doing their duties as policewomen.

In Morocco there is no "civil" society; the country is completely controlled by the dictatorship system former king Hassan II established and that his son Mohamed VI has improved and consolidated. No one does anything without the system´s approval, no one has profitable business without the king´s consent, newspapers can and are seized for whatever reason, etc. It is really funny how the Moroccan authoritarian regime has come with the "civil society" term to name this remote controlled organization that was created ad hoc for the occasion.

The re-opening of this disco has been featured in Al Jazeera Television, as well as in many other allegedly moderate muslim TV stations accross the world, also arab press, radio, web pages and all the media and the unanimous conclusion is that the fact that a disco is named after the city of Mecca is an insult. Then the official integrists muslim organizations have called to the holy war against Spanish crusaders, the demolition of our nuclear plants, the need for retaliation and all their usual crappy and sicky slogans and threats.

Meanwhile the moderate muslim community in Murcia has, while proclaiming how modarate and nice people they are, asked for the change of name for this disco as well as for some architectural remodeling.

The owners of this business have agreed to change the name and to undertake the appropriate changes of the building so as to become a more muslim friendly business.

Did these entrepreneurs accept these suggested changes out of an special sensitivity towards religion and not to offend muslims or were they scared to death of what they knew was behind the suggestions these muslim community representatives made?

Maybe the answer can be found in the endless number of businesses named "La Catedral" (The Cathedral) or La Iglesia (The Church) accross Spain. I have no news about The Vatican issuing a protest note or about Christian media calling for war.

At the end this is very much the same as the unanimous condemn that came out of the muslim world after those cartoons depicting Mohammed where published in Denmark.

.

Islam does not tolerate freedom of speech and has no room for sense of humor when who they claim to be a prophet is involved and that same applies to whatever they may think is holy and thus us infidels must refrain from even comment.

.

The same people who do not let us proselytize in the muslim countries, do not only proselytize in ours but also tell us how we must deal with whatever they consider sacred. The same people who have a highway in Saudi Arabia with a large highway sign (see picture above) that forbids non muslims to continue towards Mecca is telling us that we must rename a discotheque, build a mosque where muslims terrorist killed thousands of people or change our laws to adpt them to their lovely Sharia.

I would say it is about time to wake up and become aware of a fact that is as real as the sun rising in the east: Regardless of what we think Islam seeks, and means, submission not only from muslims, but also from us infidels and in a larger degree.

President Obama or our bewitched President zapatero can come up with their bollocks any time but that will not change the cold facts. We may not be at war with Islam but Islam is at a constant war with anything that is not Isam.

The problem is not the people but the ideology behind Islam and its compulsory mandates for supremacy. Scary? Yes, as scary as true; if someone wants your house and family the fact that you pretend to be his friend will not deter him from those objectives, furthermore it will encourage him to go on. It is about time to open a dabate on the need Islam has for a big change, or else we shall all be soon praying towards Mecca...

Tweet

Obama´s speeches or don´t letting the truth spoil your false fantasies

In his famous speech at Cairo university President Obama said among other naiveness things:

"Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance. We see it in the history of Andalusia and Cordoba during the Inquisition."

Let us analyze that sentence.

Definition of tradition by the Merriam-Webster dictionary:

"An inherited, established, or customary pattern of thought, action or behaviour."

July 2010, Pakistan. Let us see how that inherited and established pattern applies today:

Recently more Christians are facing charges under the controversial blasphemy laws in Pakistan. Christian families in Lahore were forced to flee for their safety as thousands of Muslim protesters demanded death for Christians in Faisalabad who are alleged to have blasphemed against Prophet Mohammad (PBUH).

Muslim mobs marched July 10-11 in Faisalabad City, in the province of Punjab, demanding the death penalty for two Christians, brothers Rashid Emmanuel, 32, an Evangelical pastor, and Sajid Emmanuel, a graduate business student of Daud Nagar, Faisalabad. They were arrested on July 2 on the charges of writing a pamphlet with blasphemous remarks about Prophet Mohammad (PBUH). They were detained at the Civil Lines Police Station Faisalabad.

Does that sound like a customary pattern of tolerance? Let us see what Mohamed, founder of Islam had to say to establish the beginning of that tradition of tolerance that Islam has according to barack Mohamed Obama:

"The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter" (Qur´an 5:33)

-

Very tolerant, isn´t it?

Qur’an9:123 “Fight the unbelievers around you, and let them find harshness in you.”

And the list goes on and on proving the origings of that customary pattern of tolerance Islam has for Obama.

But let us go back to President Obama´s sentences during that amazing speech full of lies and wishful thinking adressed to the Cairo University students:

"Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance. We see it in the history of Andalusia and Cordoba during the Inquisition."

.

The second of these sentences says that Islam proved to be tolerant in Andalusia and Cordoba during the Inquisition. It is hard to say so many lies all together with such few words.

Obama claims himself as a historian sometimes, then how can he read this total fiction sentence without blushing?

During the Inquisition (it would be more appropriate to say in the time of...) Cordoba was no longer under Islam´s fist. It had been reconquest by Ferdinand the Third in 1236 and all the lives of the inhabitants respected.

Lie number 1:

The Inquisition was enforced in Spain in 1478. An Islam ruled Cordoba NEVER coexisted with the Inquisition in Spain.

By the way President Obama forgets the fact that muslims were INVASORS that our ancestors fought for 800 years.

.

Lie number 2:

President Obama, the historian, forgets or does not know that Andalusia is the name of a region in Spain and in the times when we were INVADED by those "tolerant" muslims they named all Spain Al Andalus. The name of Andalusia comes from this name given to ALL Spain and Portugal so if Obama would have been more precise he would have used the term Al Andalus and not Andalusia.

.

Lie number 3:

Muslims in Spain were by no means tolerant. Non muslims were forced to pay the "Jizya" and and other special taxes for non muslims. You can imagine how many christians converted to Islam to be exented from these taxes!! Bells were not allowed to toll, non muslims were forbidden in certain jobs, muslims were told not to greet non muslims, muslims applied a total separation and granted not muslims the worst jobs and a third class citizens status.

Averroes translated the work of Aristotle for Sultan Jusuf I. As he died, his successor, Jakub Al-Mansur issued a decree in 1195 proclaiming that Greek philosophy was banned, burned the books of Aristotle and Averroes's work. Averroes was whipped before the Cordoba Mosque (built after demolishing a church in that very same spot) and was sent to the exile.

Tolerant Islam in Al Andalus Mr. Obama? Bullshit! Seems like some Imman who wants to build a mosque in NYC ground zero with funds from "tolerant" Persian Gulf states, wrote your speech since it lacks any credibility and it is nothing but fairy tales and a bunch of malicious lies.

Now Obama has said that the US is at war with Al Qaeda and not with Islam. Whatever Mr. President but you should know that Islam was, is, and will be, at war with what the West represents.

Tweet

Ground Zero Mosque. Only muslims have got rights. Non muslims cannot complaint

Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf the man promoting the building of the Ground Zero Mosque talks about serving the community, about love and understanding between faiths and about not politicizing religion and on the other hand he says that if the mosque is finally not built in the sorroundings of Ground Zero the muslim world will take this as an offence to Islam and the muslim world will understand that Islam is under attack.

Jolly good Mr. Rauf !! All your bollocks about that peace and understanding that you pretend us to believe that Islam fosters vanish the very moment you say that if you don´t get what you want then the muslim world will be very upset and see it as an offence and as an attack on Islam. Then you go on with that bullshit of yours saying that the mosque must be built on the grounds of national security being preserved. Yes we understand what you mean, if you don´t get what you want maybe the "bad guys" will do evil things, and of course no one wants these bad boys doing such things, don´t we Mr. Rauf?

Thank you Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf for acting like some kind of mafia godfather henchman that kindly warns us of what could happen if we do not do as we are being told!!

What will be next thing the West will have to do so as not to offend the peace and loving followers of Mohamed? why not a mosque in St. Peter´s Cathedral or why not teaching the Koran in all western schools?

Don´t we remember Palestinian children rejoicing at the terrorist attack on 9-11 and their parents cellebrating in the streets, I bet some of them were muslims...

Let´s imagine a bishop on Aljazeera television complaining about not being allowed to build a church in Mecca, shall we? Well only imagine it because it will never happen. The same people Mr. Rauf goes to visit in the Persian Gulf States that tell him how disappointed all muslims will be if a mosque is not built near the place where 4000 people died because some muslims in the name of Allah crashed two airplanes, they will by no means allow any church being built in Saudi Arabia and no bibles or new testaments being in their bookshops.

These people who argue and complaint about how bad Islam and muslims are treated do not EVER demonstrate to protest for the killing of priests in Turkey or the burning of bibles and churches accross the muslim Umma.

These people who ask for equal rights in the West for their religion followers do not allow other religions to proselytize in their countries. Morocco has recently expelled American Christians that were taking care of orphans. Morocco law as well as all other muslim countries legislation forbid to proselytize their nationals.

These Saudi king and princes build huge mosques all accross the Western countries and demand respect for their faith and in their country they beat Philippins servants that are caught praying or have a rosary or a bible. They do not allow to build churches or to worship and they claim for their rights abroad?

I think that Islam and muslims treat us as what they think we are (and I am afraid they are close to be right): idiots.

Muslims in all Western Europe are plundering the welfare state using the public free services such as medical care, education, integration income support, etc in a much larger scale than the rest of the population. They demand everything and collapse our services on and on and they complaint on everything here in Spain. Back in their country they kick anyone that they may think is preaching the Word of God (the Christian God, the merciful) to their citizens.

Do they claim for equal rights? It is a deal!! But they abuse the freedom we enjoy in the West to take advantage of our idiocy while they ban, forbid and prosecute christians, buddists or anyone that is not muslim.

In many muslim countries there are even specific taxes only for non muslims, in Egypt they burn Copt churches and in Indonesia they kill christians and I do not see those so called moderate muslims demonstrating against these muslim crimes.

Moderate muslims are just like UFOs, many people claim to have seen one or two but there are no actual evidences of their existence.

Now let us go back to that fictitious priest demanding in Aljazeera the building of a church in Mecca. Imagine this bishop that has come from a tour to different christian countries telling the interviewer "If this church cannot be built in Mecca the national security of muslim countries will be at risk". Odd isn´t it? What would the reaction from muslims be? Now imagine that that church is going to be built in the same spot where some fictitious christian fundamentalists blasted some bombs. Would muslim countries like the idea? Would they allow this church to be built for the sake of the freedom of cult that they of course don´t have?

If anyone can come up with an answer to those questions please leave a reply.

American flags are burnt in several muslim countries on a regular basis, it is almost a national sport in Iran and now there is a pastor in Florida who tells he will burn one or two Korans and that is a horrid sin and a matter of national security. I don´t like to burn books and I think the Koran is a good book for those who enjoy terror novels but it seems that here the only ones who have sensibility are muslims. I find ablation a much worse thing, I find stoning a much worse thing, I find burning churches and killing christians a much worse thing and yet in muslim countries those practices are usual.

In other words. Imagine dear reader that you like wine and I like beer and in my house wine is forbidden. I go to your house and I protest because you dont want to give me a fourth beer and another day you come over to my place and you ask me for some wine and I go nuts and tell you that that is an insult and that of course I will not give you wine and that you must respect my traditions.

It is as simple as that. Some reciprocity and some respect from the Islamic world is not only a need, it should be a MUST.

Some people here in Spain talk about something they call the Civilizacions Alliance, what I claim is an allience of civilized people to stop these abuses and lack of respect that us western people suffer in silence from the muslim world.

Mr. Rauf wants to name his mosque "The house of Cordoba" we shall have time to dedicate a post about why did he chose that name and what does Barack Obama have to do with that name as well.

Tweet

Al Qaeda praises and congratulates Zapatero. ETA wants his share too

In Spain the Ministry of Foreign affairs should be renamed as the Ministry for the Affairs of Foreigners.

Some months ago (see the post dedicated to it here http://thespanishview.blogspot.com/2010/08/is-paying-ramson-best-choice-zapatero.html ) two Spanish citizens were liberated by suppousedly Al Qaeda terrorist in North West Africa. The ransom payed was of some 5 to 8 million euros.

Spanish government made no comments on the money issue but Al Qaeda praised the behaviour of the Spanish government as opposed to that of the French. A French citizen who was also held captive by alqaeda in the same area was killed after a commando strike failed to rescue him. This man, like the two Spanish, was also in some humanitarian aid mission in the area but the French did not pay, thus Al Qaeda congratulated the Spanish Government for the way in which they had handle the issue and the French man was killed...

For God sake, why do we have to pay a ramson for these people on the first place? They knew where they were going and what goes on there. Now this non governmental organization is announcing a new aid trail for next season!!! Do they expect us all to pay again?

If we pay for grown people who take the decission to travel to a high risk area why on earth do not we pay for all kidnapped children? do we only pay to muslim terrorists or for those kidnapings that have a media coverage?

Zapatero, if YOU pay terrorist to save 2 lives this is what you get:

• Terrorist will not use that money to buy food or medicines for starved children, they will not buy toys or candy. They will buy guns and ammunition to go with their killing and plundering business
• Terrorist will take good note that a Spanish citizen is worth some 3 to 4 million euros whereas a French can cost the lives of the terrorists. Great news for Spaniards travelling the world: we are the most sought after by any "smart" terrorist
• the Algerian government is really upset with this Spanish attitude because they suffer the impact that this money have in their country. We have funded terrorists, terrorist do kill, therefore we have funded murder. Algeria is really very upset with the Spanish government for this matter and also for the fact that Morocco is Algeria´s first enemy (they have a territorial dispute of more than 150,000 sq kilometers in the north-central border and the Western Saharan pro independence and anti-Maroccan forces´headquarters and the logistical support are in Algeria). Algeria is Spain´s most important natural gas supplier until now. As anyone can imagine the Algerian government is not in a romance with spain nowadays.

As icing on the cake we gave away a sea surveillance airplane for free to Mauritanian authorities to thank them for the liberation of a terrorist (these terrorist do not just wanted money...)

Our chancellor Moratinos seems to be under some spell and behaves as he was to defend all dictators in the world instead of Spain´s interests. Who pays for your salary Miguel Ángel? Why don´t you have the guts to catch a plane and fly to Algiers to explain your boss´conduct?

Moroccan King Mohamed´s henchmen spit and insult Spanish policewomen in the border booths and where is Mr. Moratinos? he is out on holidays in France, please do not disturb him. Moratinos comes back from his holidays and his first statement is "no incident occured". Fourteen Spaniards are beaten by Moroccan police and he say that we must comply with other countries laws when we are in those countries regardless of the fact that the penalty for non authorized peaceful demonstration is not being kicked and punched in the public square, not even in countries like Morocco.

It seems like he has his phone only available to listen to what Hamas, Hugo Chávez or who ever wears a turbant have to say instead of defending our country interests. For some reason Moratinos reminds me of those women who write love letters to imprisoned bloody criminals or even rapers; these women are often nice and caring but they do believe what their jailed lovers tell them and end up thinking that their loved ones are not as bad as the society think and that maybe it was not their fault to have murdered or rape.

.

Moratinos is the perfect foreign affairs ministry for President Zapatero, a man who began his first years in office strutting his good mood ("talante") whatever the heck that was suppouse to be and that is on his way to have his name written in the Guinness Book of Records under the epigraph "Biggest political liers in recent History"

.

At the beginning of this year a man who knows a lot about ETA terrorism Mr Jaime Mayor Oreja was warning that an ETA truce was on its way and he was warning that this cease fire was going to be as the other previous three, just a trick.

.

Mr. Mayor Oreja former minister of interior in the Popular Party administration is well known for his accurate predictions about ETA terrorists, however most media and all the socialist flock of idiots discredited his words as usual...Now ETa is offering a truce again with the sole intention of negotiating with our weak government that their political branch can run in the forecoming local elections. Mayor Oreja was also right, as he is also right when he says that this offer is a poisoned one, again.

.

Our government knows a lot about ETa and they know quite a lot about our government too and it is going to be very difficult for Zapatero to tell our home terrorist that he will not give ETA anything when ETa is watching how their colleagues in Somalia get millions for liberating a fishing ship and their Al Qaeda (by the way i doubt these were from Al Qaeda but anyway) pals get 3 to 4 million ramson for each captive they held.

.

Now ETA using some low budget spy movie manners contacts the BBC and handles this journalist their videotape where we can watch this typical ETA´s cumbersome staging of three hooded idiots sitting on a table with some flags on the background telling their old bollocks about invented oppresion and so on. They want money too!! They want to keep their way of life and they must be jallous of their turbanted colleagues.

.

Meanwhile some foreign media lioke the Finatial Times or the BBC still call ETA "basque separatist group" like if they were a band of rock and roll instead of a mafia gang of murderers and extortionists.

Wild, wild WEST...

Tweet